Should Politics and Religion be taboos for Veterans?
For a military man, discussing politics and religion must be a taboo!
Should that rule strictly apply to a veteran also?
The minority appeasement in India ever since our independence, has been a subject of vigorous debate in recent years. The emergence of social media as a powerful tool for communication has made it possible for masses to share news. Some of the facts which were earlier hidden from the public eye, because of the print media leaning towards their favoured ideologies, are now out in the open.
A fact which cannot be refuted is that the pattern of voting by some of the minorities in India makes them strong vote banks. Political parties therefore get tempted to appease those minorities and get elected. The favours and appeasement are not a one-time affair. It must go on with more innovative schemes for continued electoral benefits. Minorities begin to see that as their right to get more and more privileges over the majority Hindus. Hindus on the other hand feel slighted in the very traditionally Hindu Sanatan land, which has already shrunk to half its glorious past. A sincere Hindu finds it insulting when arguments like “India is a nation with no religion” are thrown at him. And that, when India was split on the very basis that a specific religious community couldn’t live with Hindus.
The minorities regularly congregate and get influenced en block by religious leadership. A devoted Hindu, on the other hand may rarely go to a temple. And those visiting temples also do not follow a leader en masse with political outcomes. Therefore, while some of the minorities vote as commanded by their leaders, the Hindus leaders have no such leverage on the whole community. The divided Hindu community is vulnerable to exploitation based on caste/ regional biases. Crafty politicians make good use of that weakness while leaning on the minorities to get elected.
Therefore, Hindus in recent times, have found that the only method of educating the masses is by way of enlightening them about live issues on social media. An average Hindu would be content with government policies which favour united upliftment of an Indian including the minorities. However, he finds himself disappointed with the continued approach favouring minorities while suppressing Hindu interests. This results in even more aggressive approach from an otherwise sober group of Hindus to drive the point home within their community, which has a couldn’t care less approach to protect self-interests.
An honest Hindu does not wish to rule over the minorities. In fact, he finds the current situation of minorities appeasement dangerous for another possible split in not too distant a future. Well-meaning Hindus therefore wish to promote an atmosphere where the elected governments do not have an appeasement approach. Ironically, a majority Hindu only wishes to be treated as an equal. How can he help that happen?
Let us now look at the question we started with. Why should discussing politics and religion be a taboo for a military veteran?
Military is the paid servant of the people and is at the disposal of Government of the day, whatever may be the political complexion of that Government. Politics and religious biases are therefore meant to be strictly kept private affairs by military men. The military within cannot afford to have any differences at all, not even one vs the rest ninety-nine in a hundred.
However, the world of a veteran is different from the military confines. A veteran must get adjusted to the society. Yes, a veteran must truly follow the principles of camaraderie with which one has lived all along one’s service life. But that is true for a well-meaning civilian too. A citizen must be responsible for the protection and development of our country. And in essence a veteran must be an ideal citizen of India. He must help promote an atmosphere (even political) of justice and equality. A veteran must also discuss within the society, matters of right and wrong as he sees. How does that happen if we tell him to shut up every time, he begins a subject that touches politics or religion?
A few browbeat the others with ‘No politics, no religion’ dictate. However, criticism of the government despite a handsome record, and blown-up minority issues are accepted in the name of freedom of speech and secularism.
Just a thought!